Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Shameless Governor Candidate Bigotry

They would not be dredging up out of state charges if he were an Episcopalian.

From a United Press International article, Vampire candidate arrested on Ind. Charges:

Vampire candidate arrested on Ind. Charges

PRINCETON, Minn., Jan. 31 (UPI) -- Self-described vampire and Minnesota gubernatorial candidate Jonathan "The Impaler" Sharkey has been arrested on Indiana charges of stalking and escape. [/] Sharkey is wanted in Indianapolis on the charges on which bond has been set at $100,000, the Princeton (Minn.) Union-Eagle reported.

Princeton police said their search discovered the May 2005 warrants that led to Sharkey's arrest Monday. [/] Sharkey, 41, a native of Elizabethtown, N.J., has lived in Princeton since October.

Sharkey gained the limelight earlier this month with his Friday the 13th announcement of his candidacy for Minnesota governor under the Vampires, Witches and Pagans Party banner. [/] Among his proposals was one that would use impalement to execute murderers, rapists and terrorists. [/] "As governor," Sharkey said, "terrorists and criminals will live in fear of me, while the people of this state will be able to live fear free." [/] Specifics of the Indiana charges against Sharkey were not known immediately. [My ellipses and emphasis]

AP: A Branch of Al-Jazeera?

See article comparison below and VOTE at Adult Christian Forum Thread 91624.

Both the Associated Press and Al Jazeera appear to be spinning in the same counter-clockwise direction, using the same playbook.

(N.B. Counter-clockwise is the direction of twisting that usually causes things to fall apart.)

Compare how each supposedly fair and independent news source reports today's unexpected triumph of Bush/Blair/European diplomacy. (Al Jazeera report is toward the bottom.)

From a Yahoo! AP article, Iran: Referral Means End of Diplomacy :

Iran: Referral Means End of Diplomacy By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer

Iran struck back Tuesday at the Big Five's decision to refer the country's nuclear file to the Security Council, saying the move has no legal justification and would be the end of diplomacy. [/] At a London meeting that lasted into the early hours of Tuesday, envoys of the United States, Britain, China, France and Russia agreed to recommend that the International Atomic Energy Agency report Iran to the U.N. Security Council.

[…] "Reporting Iran's dossier to the U.N. Security Council will be unconstructive and the end of diplomacy," said Iran's leading nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani. State television quoted him as sayiny Iran still believes the issue can be resolved peacefully. [/] Vice President Gholamreza Aghazadeh, who also runs Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, said it was difficult to predict how the IAEA meeting on Thursday would develop, the semi-official Iranian Students News Agency reported. [/] "The biggest problem for the West is that they can't find any (legal) justification to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council," ISNA quoted him as saying.

Larijani also reproached Europe for the London decision, which was taken at the home of British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and attended by the foreign minister of Germany and the foreign policy chief of the European Union. [/] "Europeans should pay more attention. Iran has called for dialogue and is moving in the direction of reaching an agreement through peaceful means," Larijani said.

Hours earlier, British, French and German representatives had met Larijani's deputy, Javad Vaedi, in Brussels for last-ditch talks on the dispute, but failed to make any progress. [/] Last week, Larijani flew to Moscow and Beijing to seek Russian and Chinese support against the Western drive to refer Iran to the Security Council.

The decision by Russia and China to vote for referral surprised observers as the two nations have consistently counselled caution on Iran's nuclear file. Both have major economic ties with Iran.

A French government official, speaking on the customary condition of anonymity, said the Russian and Chinese ministers had been persuaded of the need to show a united front. [/] The United States accuses Iran of trying to build atomic weapons. Iran denies this, saying its nuclear program is only for generating electricity.

Iran broke IAEA seals at a uranium enrichment plant Jan. 10 and resumed small-scale enrichment. The decision provoked an outcry as enrichment is a process that can produce material for nuclear reactors or bombs. Britain, France and Germany, who had been negotiating with Iran, said they would press the IAEA to refer the matter to the Security Council.

If the IAEA votes to refer Iran to the Security Council on Thursday, Iran is likely to retaliate immediately. [/] Iran's parliament has approved a law requiring the government to stop all voluntary cooperation with IAEA in the event of referral. This would mean that Iran stops allowing IAEA inspectors to carry out intrusive searches of its facilities and the country resumes large-scale enrichment of uranium.

Iran insists it has the right as a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to build nuclear power stations and produce their fuel by enriching its own uranium. [/] But the United States and Europe do not trust that Iran would enrich uranium only for peaceful purposes because the country has concealed significant aspects of its nuclear program in the past. [/] While the IAEA has said it has found no evidence of Iran's building nuclear weapons, it has refused to give Iran a clean bill of health because of numerous unanswered questions over its atomic program. [My ellipses and emphasis]


From an Al Jazeera article, Iran threatens end to diplomacy :

Iran threatens end to diplomacy [/] Tuesday 31 January 2006 2:32 PM GMT

Larijani reproached Europe for the London decision [/] Iran has struck back at the Big Five powers' decision to refer Iran's nuclear file to the Security Council, saying referral would mean the end of diplomacy over its nuclear programme. [/] Still, in what appeared to be an attempt to show cooperation with the West, Iran handed over documents last week on casting uranium into the shape of a warhead to the UN nuclear agency, diplomats in Vienna revealed.

At a London meeting that lasted into the early hours of Tuesday, envoys of Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States decided they would recommend that at its Thursday meeting the International Atomic Energy Agency should report Iran to the UN Security Council. [/] They also decided the Security Council should wait until the agency issues a formal report on Iran in March before tackling the issue.

Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, on Tuesday reproached Europe for the London decision. [/] "Reporting Iran's dossier to the UN Security Council will be unconstructive and the end of diplomacy," he said, according to state-run television. [/] "Europeans should pay more attention. Iran has called for dialogue and is moving in the direction of reaching an agreement through peaceful means," Larijani said. "The Islamic Republic of Iran doesn't welcome this. We still think that this issue can be resolved peacefully. We recommend them not to do it."

"If the Security Council is informed or seized over Iran's nuclear case, we will be obliged - in accordance with the law passed by parliament - to end all voluntary measures and cease the application of the additional protocol," Ali Larijani said. [/] Aghazadeh said there was no legal justification against Iran [/] Iran has previously threatened to stop allowing surprise IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities if it is put before the Security Council. Iran's parliament has passed a law requiring the government to stop such cooperation and resume large-scale uranium enrichment in case of referral to the Council.

Iran insists it has the right as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to build nuclear power stations and produce fuel by enriching its own uranium. But the US and Europe suspect Iran aims to use enrichment to produce nuclear weapons, an accusation Iran denies. [/] Vice President Gholamreza Aghazadeh, who also runs Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, said there was no "legal justification to refer Iran to the UN Security Council", according to the semi-official Iranian Students News Agency.

In Vienna, Iran's oil minister said the gathering storm over the nuclear issue would not affect Iran's oil policy. [/] "We have no reason to stop our exports" because of the nuclear issue, Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh said before Tuesday's meeting of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. "From our point of view there's no link between the two."

[…] British, French and German representatives met Larijani's deputy, #### [(first name deemed unfit by Delphi for technical not taste reasons it looks like)] Vaedi, in Brussels on Tuesday for last-ditch talks on the dispute, but failed to make any progress.

The decision by Russia and China to vote for referral surprised observers as they have consistently counselled caution on Iran's nuclear file. Both have major economic ties with Iran.

[…] Russian and Chinese diplomats will head to Tehran shortly to explain the meaning of the agreement reached in London and urge Iran to meet IAEA demands, he said, according to the RIA-Novosti news agency. [/] Moscow is trying to prevent the referral from scuttling negotiations that it hopes will persuade Iran to accept a compromise proposal - that Iranian uranium enrichment take place on Russian territory. [My ellipses and emphasis]


Poll Question: AP: A Branch of Al Jazeera?

Poll Choices:
1. Absolutely. Both actually owned by Saudis. | 2. Yes. Both bury Bush triumph. | 3. Yes. | 4. Often looks like it. | 5. Sometimes looks like it. | 6. No. AP actually owned by George Soros. | 7. No. AP actually owned by Teresa Kerry. | 8. No. Iran bluster more exciting. | 9. No. Columbia Journalism grads run both. | 10. No. Good news judgment by both. | 11. No. | 12. Other. | 13. No comment. | 14. No opinion. | 15. This poll is worthless. | 16. This poll is of negative value.

VOTE at Adult Christian Forum Thread 91624.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Will the U.N. Keep Us Safe?

See article below and VOTE at Adult Christian Forum Thread 91542.

From a The Austrailian article, Iranians crack atomic agency:

Iranians crack atomic agency [/] 31jan06

LONDON: Iran has formed a secret team of scientists to infiltrate the UN's nuclear watchdog in Vienna, British media reported yesterday. [/] London's Daily Telegraph said the team was targeting the International Atomic Energy Agency's safeguards division to obtain information on the work of inspectors so Iran could conceal the more sensitive areas of its nuclear research.

The operation was being run by the former head of the Iranian parliament's energy committee, Hosein Afarideh. [/] Mr Afarideh, reported to have close links with Iran's ministry of intelligence, is in regular contact with a team of Iranian nuclear engineers seconded to work at the IAEA's Vienna headquarters, the report said. [/]

According to Western intelligence reports, Mr Afarideh heads a three-man team at the headquarters of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran in Tehran, to prevent more embarrassing disclosures about its nuclear facilities, the Daily Telegraph reported.

In the past, Iran has concealed key facilities from IAEA inspectors, including the Natanz uranium enrichment plant, 160km north of Isfahan. It was forced to admit the existence of Natanz and other secret facilities three years ago after Iranian exile groups provided details of the operation.

Western intelligence officials told the newspaper the Iranians were taking advantage of their access to the IAEA to spy on its inspection procedures so they could conceal sensitive areas of their nuclear operations. [/] "The Iranians are getting increasingly concerned about the effectiveness of the IAEA's inspections," an official said. "For this reason they are deliberately targeting the IAEA so that they can be better prepared when the inspectors visit their facilities."

The claim came as German Chancellor Angela Merkel used her first visit to Israel at the weekend to deliver a strong criticism of Iran, saying it threatened not only the Jewish state but also the entire democratic world. [/] Israel, the European Union and the US accuse Iran of trying to build an atom bomb. Tehran denies this. [/] "I don't see the slightest difference in the views of Germany and Israel," Ms Merkel said. "It is clear that Iran should not get the ability to enrich uranium." […] [My ellipses and emphasis]


Poll Question: Will the U.N. Keep Us Safe?

Poll Choices:
1. Absolutely. U.S. should fully fund and support it. | 2. Yes. Annan's reform program is a winner. | 3. Yes. The day of nation states is over. | 4. Yes. Show others that we trust them. | 5. Yes. | 6. Mostly. | 7. Don't bet on it. | 8. No. Bunch of corrupt decadent bureaucrats. | 9. No. National defense is a Federal responsibility. | 10. No. Too many totalitarian members. | 11. No. Can't keep people safe from U.N. troops. | 12. No. | 13. Other. | 14. No comment. | 15. No opinion. | 16. This poll is worthless. | 17. This poll is of negative value.

VOTE at Adult Christian Forum Thread 91542.

Doonesbury on Faith

From a Doonesbury.com daily dose, Doonesbury Flashback, Jan. 29, '06.:

Bush doesn't think about anything -- he just believes things, so he's never conflicted by reality. [Gary Trudeau's emphasis.]


Trudeau is making progress:

Hebrews 11:1 KJV Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Hebrews 11:3 KJV Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

Hebrews 11:6 KJV But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

Proverbs 3:5-6 KJV Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. (6) In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.


But Trudeau is a bit retarded for one over 40:

"A man who is not a socialist at 20 has no heart. A man who is still a socialist at 40 has no brains." - Churchill (but originated with a French statesman, I believe)


His predecessor as America's most popular and highly accurate social commentator, Al Capp, was also a late learner.

But Capp was living in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in the Sixties. And the behavior of the students of America's preeminent university accelerated his education.

Capp appropriately rewarded the students whose behavior improved his worldview by featuring an inspired version of their activities in Li'l Abner. There, they were known as an activist group, "Students Wildly Indignant about Nearly Everything", usually abbreviated as "S.W.I.N.E.".

(The Harvard-inspired student activist faction is not to be confused with the excellent Storm Region real-time strategy game, also called S.W.I.N.E., which involves a highly disciplined group of actual pigs who are involved in a conflict with bunny rabbits.)

So there may be hope for Gary Trudeau. Stay tuned.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Shameless False Identity Bigotry

This is blatant discrimination.

A university professor with tenure can impersonate a native American with impunity.

But a writer of gay pornography is discriminated against.

From an Editor and Publisher AP article, Publisher Will No Longer Ship Books by 'Nasdijj':

Getting Frey-ed? Publisher Will No Longer Ship Books by 'Nasdijj' After Newspapers Challenge Identity [/] Published: January 27, 2006 11:00 PM ET

NEW YORK The publisher of two memoirs by Nasdijj, an award-winning Navajo author whose identity has been strongly challenged, said Friday that it would no longer ship his books and would accept returns of copies from book sellers.

"This looks pretty conclusive," Ballantine spokeswoman Carol Schneider said after The News and Observer of Raleigh, N.C., reported Friday that Nasdijj‘s Social Security number matched the number of a white man, Timothy P. Barrus, who had a prior career writing gay pornography.

Doubts about the background of Nasdijj were first raised Wednesday by an alternative publication, LA Weekly, in a story that cited documents and interviews with scholars, Indian authors and his acquaintances and colleagues.

Barrus, 55, could not be located and did not respond to interview requests from the newspaper or The Associated Press. Nasdijj lived in Chapel Hill in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

In a long posting on his blog, http://www.nasdijj.typepad.com, Nasdijj did not acknowledge any wrongdoing, writing Friday: "The real scandal is that the real story of Nasdijj could never, ever be published because no publisher has the courage." He also referred to Oprah Winfrey , who on Thursday chastised memoirist James Frey for taking extensive liberties with his best-selling "A Million Little Pieces."

Nasdijj emerged in 1999 with an article in Esquire about his adopted son, a Najavo named Tommy Nothing Fancy, and the boy‘s death from fetal alcohol syndrome. The article was a finalist for a National Magazine Award and led to a book contract with Houghton Mifflin, which in 2000 published "The Blood Runs Like a River Through My Dreams." In 2004, the book was chosen for a citywide reading club in Salt Lake City.

In one interview, he said as a child he was "hungry, raped, beaten, whipped, and forced at every opportunity to work in the fields." [My ellipses and emphasis]

Decadent Capitalism On the Rise in China

BREITBART.COM - Chinese Celebrating New Year in New Style:
Chinese Celebrating New Year in New Style / Jan 27 4:43 PM US/Eastern / By AUDRA ANG / Associated Press Writer / BEIJING

Picture this: Lobster cooked eight ways. Sharks' fin bathed in a rich brown sauce. Stewed bird's nest sweetened with apricots. Abalone braised until tender.

Now, the bill for a party of 10: $24,500.

The Lao Zhengxing restaurant in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou has taken culinary decadence to new heights with its Chinese New Year banquet menu _ a mix of exorbitantly priced ingredients and flashy cooking topped off with a dash of self-promotion.

Just a few years ago, Chinese spent the Lunar New Year _ their most celebrated holiday _ preparing feasts at home. But now, increasingly wealthy and busy, they are splurging on restaurant banquets. Eateries like Lao Zhengxing with special New Year menus are benefiting.

'It is the time for families to gather,' said Bian Jiang, Secretary General of the China Cuisine Association. 'People expect and enjoy higher standards of food, teas, wines and services during the New Year.'

Friday, January 27, 2006

Don't follow super-size Americans, says Prince -Charles

Don't follow super-size Americans, says Prince Charles Times Online.

THE Prince of Wales warned the British people last night that they were in danger of becoming as obese as many Americans because they did not walk or cycle enough.

The Prince, who has a fleet of chauffeur-driven cars and has rarely if ever been seen in public on the saddle of a bike, said: “We are perhaps not very far behind our American cousins in the ‘super-sizing epidemic’.”

In his speech at St James’s Palace he gave warning of a worrying sharp rise in childhood obesity. His intervention comes after the British Medical Association said that Britain’s fat youngsters, who account for a third of all obese children in Europe, were at high risk of developing life-threatening conditions, including diabetes and heart disease. One million under-16s were so fat that they were putting their health at risk, the BMA said.

Insurgent "Freegans" Hit Rubish Bins!

From a Breitbart.com article, Garbage gourmets on the streets of New York :

Garbage gourmets on the streets of New York [/] Jan 27 10:51 AM US/Eastern

I've got yogurts!" Stephen Woloshin shouts in triumph, causing other members of his group to lift their rummaging arms and heads from the rubbish bins outside a Manhattan supermarket.

Teachers, social workers and students, Woloshin and his fellow scavengers are far removed from the swollen ranks of New York's homeless, belonging instead to a new faction on the fringes of the environmental movement.

As "freegans," they regard over-consumption as a pernicious global trend and seek to demonstrate how people can feed themselves for "free" on the mountains of produce discarded by others. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Anti-Terrorist WMD Unit Proposed

From a Washington Times article, Strategy targets terror WMDs :

Strategy targets terror WMDs [/] By Bill Gertz /THE WASHINGTON TIMES [/] Published January 27, 2006

The Pentagon's latest four-year strategy report calls for setting up a special military task force to prevent weapons of mass destruction from being transferred to terrorist groups, The Washington Times has learned.

The task force will employ special operations forces, other troops and intelligence personnel to prevent states such as North Korea and Iran from supplying nuclear, chemical and biological weapons to terror groups. […] [My ellipses and emphasis]

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Wrong Career Choice?

From a Yahoo! AP article, Alleged Crack Dealer Uses Business Cards:

[…] [Leavenworth, Kansas police Major Kitchens] said police had heard for some time that Williams had been selling drugs in the area. "Then we heard that he was handing out business cards," the officer said. "In the course of our investigation we were fortunate to come up with one, and we gave him a call."

Kitchens said the business card had an image of what appeared to be an alarm clock being hit by a boxing glove and said: "For a quick hit on time call the boss."

"When he answered, we agreed to buy some crack from him, we went up there, and we arrested him," Kitchens said. [/] The arrest was made Friday. [/] "It makes our job considerably easier when they advertise and let us know where to get ahold of them," Kitchens said. [My ellipses and emphasis]


The advertising business might have been a better career choice for Williams.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

"'God Is Love'" - Benedict XVI

A blessed beginning in his first Encyclical.

I am reminded of the comment of a chambermaid about John XXIII:

They made a mistake. They elected a Christian. That is not supposed to happen. First he has to be made a bishop, then he has to be made an archbishop, then he has to be made a cardinal, then he is elected pope. But nobody noticed that he is a Christian. Something went wrong.


From a Yahoo! AP article, Pope Encyclical Mandates Charity :

Pope Encyclical Mandates Charity By NICOLE WINFIELD, Associated Press Writer

Pope Benedict XVI said Wednesday in his first encyclical that the Roman Catholic Church has no desire to govern states or set public policy, but can't remain silent when its charity is needed to ease suffering around the world.

In the long-awaited document "God is Love," Benedict explores the relationship between God's love for mankind and the church's works of charity, saying the two are intrinsically linked and the foundation of the Christian faith.

[…] He rejected the criticism of charity found in Marxist thought, which holds that charity is merely an excuse by the rich to keep the poor in their place when the rich should be working for a more just society.

While the Marxist model, in which the state tries to provide for every social need, did respond to the plight of the poor faster than even the church did during the Industrial Revolution, it was a failed experiment because it couldn't respond to every human need, he wrote.

Even in the most just societies, charity will always be necessary, he said.

"There will always be suffering which cries out for consolation and help. There will always be loneliness. There will always be situations of material need where help in the form of concrete love of neighbor is indispensable," he said.

Benedict stressed that the state alone is responsible for creating that just society, not the church. "As a political task, this cannot be the church's immediate responsibility," he said.

However, he said the church wants to be involved in political life by helping "form consciences in political life and stimulate greater insight into the authentic requirements of justice as well as greater readiness to act accordingly, even when this might involve conflict with situations of personal interest."

He said the church was "duty-bound" to offer such a contribution, and that the lay faithful, who as citizens of the state, are duty-bound to carry it out through works of charity.

While stressing that the church has no direct political role, he did offer a prescription for what the state should do.

"We do not need a state which regulates and controls everything, but a state which, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, generously acknowledges and supports initiatives arising from the different social forces and [that combine] spontaneity with closeness to those in need," he wrote. [My correction, ellipses and emphasis]

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Global Warming Strikes Again!

Snowstorm Closes Hawaii Volcano To Tourists
Rare Event Causes Concern, Surprise

POSTED: 6:18 pm EST January 23, 2006
UPDATED: 6:44 pm EST January 23, 2006

MAUNA KEA, Hawaii -- Officials closed the summit of Hawaii's Mauna Kea volcano to the public after a snowstorm shut down access for the first time this winter season.

Clouds blanketed Hawaii's tallest peak this weekend. A blanket of snow forced everyone to evacuate, including park rangers.

(Check out the snow from Honolulu TV station KITV's Web cam on Mauna Kea)

"We've got to make sure and keep everybody healthy and safe on the summit. So, I'm closing it," Mauna Kea ranger Kimo Pihana said.

The heavy snowfall was a rare sight, even for those who are up there almost every day.

"The snow began to accumulate very quickly and we had to evacuate to prevent being trapped on the summit," telescope operator Paul Sears said.

A California family was at the summit when the snow started falling, before the road was shut down.

"Did you ever think you'd see snow in Hawaii?" a reporter asked.

"Wasn't really expecting to see snow in Hawaii," said Bob Nyman.

"So it's a nice treat on your vacation?" the reporter asked.

"Oh absolutely. It was great," Nyman said.

For visitors who didn't have timing on their side, the trek ended at the 9,000-foot mark where the road was closed.

Government Does Something Right!

From a Yahoo! AP article, W.Va. Lawmakers Approve Mine Safety Rules :

W.Va. Lawmakers Approve Mine Safety Rules By LAWRENCE MESSINA, Associated Press Writer [/] Tue Jan 24, 4:57 AM ET

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - West Virginia lawmakers approved a wide raft of measures aimed at improving safety in the mine shafts beneath the nation's second-largest coal producing state, an overhaul triggered by the deaths of 14 miners in two accidents this month. [/] In a span of eight hours Monday, the state Legislature reviewed and passed Gov. Joe Manchin's proposals to better track miners underground, prompt faster emergency responses and stockpile oxygen for stranded miners. [/] "These 14 miners have not died in vain," [Governor] Manchin said afterward. "No miner's family is going to have to endure what we all endured for 90 hours over the past three weeks."

The measures, passed unanimously in a single bill, came too late to potentially help Ellery Hatfield, 47, one of two miners killed in a conveyor belt fire at the Aracoma Coal Alma No. 1 mine. [/] "I just wish they would have done it before and maybe I'd have my daddy here with me," said his daughter Brittany Hatfield, 18. "He was a hero before he even was in the mine."

[…] Once the governor signs the bill, coal companies will have to comply by the end of February. While the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration enforces federal safety laws, states can pass more stringent mining regulations if they want to.

[…] The deaths of the two workers at the Alma mine occurred three weeks after 12 miners died after an explosion at the Sago Mine, about 180 miles away. In addition, a coal miner died in Kentucky on Jan. 10. [/] John Groves, whose brother Jerry was among the miners who died after the Sago explosion, said he believes his brother would have been alive if the measure had been in place earlier. [/] "To know that everybody's working to get this passed this way is amazing. Government doesn't usually work this way," Groves said. "It's sad to say, but you learn from your mistakes."

[…] Manchin's proposal creates a new rapid response system for mine and industrial accidents, and requires coal operators to issue emergency communicators and personal tracking devices to all underground miners.

[…] Manchin also wants all mining companies to store extra oxygen canisters throughout the mines, something that some companies already do. Miners would be directed to the storage areas by battery-operated strobe lights in emergencies. [/] Manchin also proposed fining coal companies $100,000 if they fail to report an emergency within 15 minutes. At Sago, company officials placed the first calls to state and federal safety officials more than an hour after the explosion. It was not immediately clear when the first calls were placed in the Aracoma fire. [/] "We're not blaming anybody," the governor said. "We're saying there hasn't been enough emphasis on getting the properly trained men and women and the equipment moving quickly enough." [/] Associated Press Writer Kelley Schoonover contributed to this report. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Sunday, January 22, 2006

Ex-Clinton Adviser Sees Jesus

From a Sunday Herald [Glasgow, Scotland] article, Naomi Wolf: I had a vision of Jesus :

Naomi Wolf: I had a vision of Jesus [/] Exclusive: By Torcuil Crichton [/] 22 January 2006

Naomi Wolf, one of America’s foremost feminist thinkers, has found a spiritual awakening in God after experiencing a “mystical encounter” with Jesus. [/] Wolf, best known as the author of the Beauty Myth, a groundbreaking 1991 polemic against the cosmetics industry that radicalised a generation of young women, revealed the cause of a hitherto unexplained mid-life crisis that set her on a “spiritual path”.

In an interview with the Sunday Herald, Wolf spoke publicly for the first time about her vision. Her comments will spark a theological skirmish in the United States and leave her open to further attacks from other feminist critics. [/] Wolf admitted that, during a therapy session to treat writer’s block, she encountered what she described as a holographic image of Jesus.

“I actually had this vision of Jesus, and I’m sure it was Jesus,” said Wolf. “But it wasn’t this crazy theological thing; it was just this figure who was the most perfected human being that there could be – full of light and full of love.” [/] More bizarrely, she experienced this as a teenage boy. “I was a 13-year-old boy sitting next to him and feeling feelings I’d never felt in my lifetime,” said Wolf. “[Feelings] of a boy being with an older male who he really loves and admires and loves to be in the presence of. It was probably the most profound experience of my life. I haven’t talked about it publicly.”

Wolf emphasised that her spiritual renewal strengthened her commitment to feminism as her life mission. “I believe that each of us is here to help repair the world,” she said. “My particular mission seems to be about helping women remember what’s sacred about them or what’s sacred about femininity .”

She also expressed apprehension that her faith would be hijacked by religious groups. “I don’t want to be co-opted as the poster child for any religion or any agenda,” said Wolf, who was brought up in a liberal Jewish household. “There are a lot of people out there just waiting for some little Jewish feminist to cross over. I don’t claim to get where this being fits into the scheme of things but I absolutely believe in divine providence now, absolutely believe God totally cares about every single one of us intimately.”

Despite pleas to distance her faith from any religion, her admission to seeing the “child of God” will trigger a theological battle between the American Christian right and the Jewish lobby over the ownership of her soul.

Wolf, a one-time adviser to President Clinton, has been attacked before by the Republican right in 2000 when it was revealed she advised Al Gore to start behaving like an “alpha” male in his presidential campaign.

In America’s fractured feminist movement, Wolf’s pronouncement will be leapt on as further evidence that she has strayed from the mainstream. Wolf has often been verbally mauled by other feminist writers for her embracing thesis of feminism. In a series of successful books, Wolf has projected her own experiences into a universal ideology for women.

[…] In America, finding God is an acceptable resolution to mid-life crisis and, Smith said, there is room within feminism for spiritualism in much the same way as other movements accommodate their own spiritual wings. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Take Home from USSC Justice?

See text below and Vote at Adult Christian Fellowship Thread 91097.

Live Free or Die. - New Hampshire State Motto.

[Activists] want [U.S. Supreme Court] Justice David Souter's home seized for the purpose of building an inn called "Lost Liberty Hotel." [/] They submitted enough petition signatures — only 25 were needed — to bring the matter before voters [of Weare, New Hampshire] in March. […]

"This is in the tradition of the Boston Tea Party and the Pine Tree Riot," organizer Logan Darrow Clements said, referring to the riot that took place during the winter of 1771-1772, when colonists in Weare [,New Hampshire] beat up officials appointed by King George III who fined them for logging white pines without approval. [/] "All we're trying to do is put an end to eminent domain abuse," Clements said, by having those who advocate or facilitate it "live under it, so they understand why it needs to end."


More about both proposed and past actions against government oppression in Weare, New Hampshire, may be found below:

From a New Hampshire History Curriculum article, We Had a Riot :

[…] We Had a Riot

Background: The Pine Tree Riot - Weare, NH, April 1772 [/] Summarized by Betty Ann Sutton from History of the Town of Weare, New Hampshire

[…] No matter who owned or cleared the land, the white pines on the land belonged to the King of England. In 1772 the British Parliament and King George III made a law protecting "any white pine tree of the growth of twelve inches in diameter." There was already a law protecting the larger white pine trees. All of these laws meant that the settlers couldn't cut any white pines unless they had the Deputy Surveyor come to mark the trees with the broad arrow, saving them for [Royal Navy] masts. Then the settlers had to pay a tidy sum of money to get a royal license to cut the rest of the white pines from their own land.

[…] Benning's nephew, John Wentworth. became governor in 1766. John Wentworth soon saw how much money was being lost by not enforcing the license fees and fines for the pine tree laws in the new towns, so he instructed the Deputy Surveyors to attend to their duties.

[…] The mill owners from Goffstown paid their fines at once and had their logs returned to them. But the sawmill owners from Weare did not. They decided to be "obstinate and notorious" even though Blodget had sent them letters warning them against it.

On April 13, Benjamin Whiting, the Sheriff of the County, and his deputy, John Quigly, rode to South Weare. They came with a warrant for the arrest of sawmill owner Ebenezer Mudgett. Mudgett was the leader of the Weare mill owners. The sheriff thought that if he arrested Mudgett, the other mill owners would give in and pay their fines.

[…] Mudgett rode to Quimby's Inn at dawn and burst in on the sheriff, who was still in bed. Then more than twenty townsmen, with their faces blackened for disguise, rushed into the sheriffs room and began to beat him with tree branch switches. Sheriff Whiting tried to grab his guns so he could defend himself, but he was thoroughly outnumbered. Men grabbed him by his arms and legs, hoisted him up, face to the floor, while others continued to switch him mercilessly. Whiting later reported that he thought the men would surely kill him. Deputy Quigly was also pulled from his room and received the same treatment from another group of townsmen.

The sheriff and deputy's horses were brought around to the inn door. The soot-blackened townsmen cropped off the horses' ears and sheared off their manes and tails - ruining the value of the animals. The two men were forced to mount and were shouted and slapped down the road toward
Goffstown.

[…] The rioters were very humble and submitted themselves to the grace of the court and king. They were lucky. The judges fined each of the men 20
shillings and ordered them to pay the cost of the court hearing.

It was certainly a light punishment for the crimes they had committed. The small fine ordered by the judges showed that they understood why the men from Weare attacked the sheriff and deputy. The judges, like many other citizens of New Hampshire, thought the pine tree laws were oppressive and unfair. […] [My ellipses and emphasis]


(George III later decided to let the rebellious and ungrateful inhabitants of New Hampshire and several other colonies go their own way. Ridding himself of responsibility for their care in the Treaty of Paris in 1783.)

Is the Spirit of 1772 still alive in Weare, New Hampshire? Stay tuned:

From a Yahoo! AP article, Activists Seek to Evict Souter From Home :

Activists Seek to Evict Souter From Home By KATHY McCORMACK, Associated Press Writer [/] Sat Jan 21, 7:54 AM ET

CONCORD, N.H. - Angered by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that sided with a Connecticut city that wanted to seize homes for economic development, a group of activists is trying to get one of the justices who voted for the decision evicted from his own home. [/] The group, led by a California man, wants Justice David Souter's home seized for the purpose of building an inn called "Lost Liberty Hotel." [/] They submitted enough petition signatures — only 25 were needed — to bring the matter before voters in March. This weekend, they're descending on Souter's hometown, the central New Hampshire town of Weare, population 8,500, to rally for support. [/] "This is in the tradition of the Boston Tea Party and the Pine Tree Riot," organizer Logan Darrow Clements said, referring to the riot that took place during the winter of 1771-1772, when colonists in Weare beat up officials appointed by King George III who fined them for logging white pines without approval. [/] "All we're trying to do is put an end to eminent domain abuse," Clements said, by having those who advocate or facilitate it "live under it, so they understand why it needs to end."

[…] "The justice doesn't have any comment about it," Kathy Arberg, a Supreme Court spokeswoman, said about the protesters' cause. [/] The petition asks whether the town should take Souter's land for development as an inn; whether to set up a trust fund to accept donations for legal expenses; and whether to set up a second trust fund to accept donations to compensate Souter for taking his land. [/] The matter goes to voters on March 14.

Clements said participants planned to meet at Weare Town Hall on Saturday morning and divide into teams to go door-to-door to get more petition signatures. He also wants to distribute copies of the Supreme Court's decision, Kelo vs. City of New London, to residents. [/] The court said New London, Conn., could seize homeowners' property to develop a hotel, convention center, office space and condominiums next to Pfizer Inc.'s new research headquarters. [/] The city argued that tax revenues and new jobs from the development would benefit the public. The Pfizer complex was built, but seven homeowners challenged the rest of the development in court. The Supreme Court's ruling against them prompted many states, including New Hampshire, to examine their eminent domain laws. […] [My ellipses and emphasis]


Poll Question: Take Home from USSC Justice? | Poll Choices:

1. Yes. He took the homes of others. | 2. Yes. The Supremes have gone too far. | 3. Yes. Up with Lost Liberty Hotel! | 4. Yes. Why not? | 5. Yes. | 6. Maybe. Will consider. | 7. Up to local voters. | 8. Undecided. | 9. Never! Keep judiciary independent! | 10.Never! Activism run amuck! | 11. No. His offense official not personal. | 12. No. Impeach them instead. | 13. No. Ridiculous idea. | 14. No. | 15. Other. | 16. No comment. | 17. No opinion. | 18. This poll is worthless. | 19. This poll is of negative value.

Friday, January 20, 2006

The Triumph of Five Deaths

2 Corinthians 2:14 KJV Now thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place.

From a WSJ Opinion Journal article, Triumph From Tragedy :

Triumph From Tragedy [/] Five missionaries' murders were not the end of the story. [/] BY DAVID M. HOWARD JR. [/] Friday, January 20, 2006 12:01 a.m.

On Jan. 8, 1956, five American missionaries were speared and hacked to death by a group of Auca Indians in the deepest jungles of Ecuador, making headlines around the world. A movie commemorating the 50th anniversary of the event--and the stranger-than-fiction tale that followed--is being released today. "End of the Spear," based on a 2005 book by Steve Saint, the son of one of the slain missionaries, will be shown in 1,200 theaters across the country.

The five missionaries--Jim Elliot, Pete Fleming, Ed McCully, Nate Saint and Roger Youderian--were young men eager to bring the Gospel to this savage tribe (known today as "Waorani"), who routinely killed any outsiders they encountered. The five prepared to make contact with the tribe for months, even learning Waorani phrases from a tribe member who had escaped years earlier. Nate Saint flew a small, single-engine plane in circles over the tribe's territory every Saturday for 12 weeks, trailing a long line behind the plane to which he attached gifts; the Indians reciprocated, tying gifts of their own onto the line.

On Jan. 3, the group landed on a sandbar in the Curaray River, where the men set up camp. On Jan. 6, three Waorani came out of the jungle, and there was a friendly exchange for several hours. But two days later, several Waorani warriors burst out of the jungle and killed the five with spears and machetes. Though the missionaries had guns, they shot their weapons into the air rather than defend themselves, an action they had decided upon beforehand and one later confirmed by their attackers.

The news was excruciating for the five widows, but it was not the end of the story. They all shared their husbands' vision, and three stayed in Ecuador after the deaths, working with other tribes and waiting for the opportunity to make another contact with the Waorani. Less than two years after the massacre, in November 1957, two Waorani women--who had opposed the killings--walked to a settlement of Quechua Indians, in an attempt to escape their own tribe and find the white men. There they encountered Elisabeth Elliot, the widow of Jim Elliot. Within a year, the Waorani women invited Elisabeth, her daughter Valerie and Rachel Saint, sister of Nate Saint, to come back to the tribe with them. The missionaries accepted.

The women learned the Waorani language, eventually translating portions of the New Testament for the tribe; "God's carvings," the Indians called them. The women also taught the natives rudimentary medicine. Elisabeth and Valerie lived with the tribe for four years, but Rachel remained until her death in 1994.

The ministry of these women resulted in a remarkable change. In this 250-person tribe, characterized by some anthropologists as the most violent ever encountered (the homicide rate even within the tribe was more than 60%), the killings stopped. Today, there are about 2,000 Waorani and a third of them are Christian.

Over the years, Steve Saint visited his Aunt Rachel many times, and he was "adopted" by the Waorani as one of their own. As a teenager, he was baptized in the river by two of the men who had speared his father; he calls one member of the tribe, Mincaye (who is still alive today), his second father. After Rachel's death, the tribe asked Steve to come live with them to continue her work. It was a radical request, but Steve and his family soon headed to Ecuador. They built a house hewn from trees in the jungle, and helped the tribe procure medicine and taught them the skills they needed to interact with outsiders.

My own interest in this story is deeply personal--Elisabeth Elliot is my aunt (my father's sister), Valerie is my cousin and Jim Elliot was my father's best friend. I often think about the sacrifices the five missionaries and their families made.

The explanation for the behavior of these men and women is not easily apprehended in our time. All these principals had a worldview that transcended the material world: In college, Jim Elliot wrote in his journal that "he is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." The religious faith of these men also demanded from them an almost unimaginable empathy. Nate Saint explained in his diary: "Would that we could comprehend the lot of these stone-age people who live in mortal fear of ambush on the jungle trail . . . those to whom the bark of a gun means sudden, mysterious death . . . those who think all men in all the world are killers like themselves. If God would grant us the vision, the word sacrifice would disappear from our lips and thoughts."

The Waorani today are thankful that Elisabeth and Rachel came to them, in spite of everything. Mincaye says: "My ancestors didn't know God's carvings [writings]. How could they walk God's trail if they didn't see God's carvings?"

For years after the initial massacre, the Waorani marveled at the fact that the victims did not use their guns to fend off the attack. Why was this so? Because, as their diaries show, the five men believed that they were ready to meet their maker while the Waorani were not. Such tales of selfless love are rare today, and worthy of celebration. Why not Hollywood?

Mr. Howard is the dean of the Center for Biblical and Theological Foundations at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minn. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Send Skill Jobs Overseas?

(See article below and Vote at Adult Christian Forum Thread 91007.)

From a Yahoo! AP article, Study: Most College Students Lack Skills :

Study: Most College Students Lack Skills By BEN FELLER, AP Education Writer

WASHINGTON - Nearing a diploma, most college students cannot handle many complex but common tasks, from understanding credit card offers to comparing the cost per ounce of food. [/] Those are the sobering findings of a study of literacy on college campuses, the first to target the skills of students as they approach the start of their careers.

More than 50 percent of students at four-year schools and more than 75 percent at two-year colleges lacked the skills to perform complex literacy tasks. [/] That means they could not interpret a table about exercise and blood pressure, understand the arguments of newspaper editorials, compare credit card offers with different interest rates and annual fees or summarize results of a survey about parental involvement in school.

The results cut across three types of literacy: analyzing news stories and other prose, understanding documents and having math skills needed for checkbooks or restaurant tips. [/] "It is kind of disturbing that a lot of folks are graduating with a degree and they're not going to be able to do those things," said Stephane Baldi, the study's director at the American Institutes for Research, a behavioral and social science research organization.

Most students at community colleges and four-year schools showed intermediate skills, meaning they could perform moderately challenging tasks. Examples include identifying a location on a map, calculating the cost of ordering office supplies or consulting a reference guide to figure out which foods contain a particular vitamin.

"But do they do well enough for a highly educated population? For a knowledge-based economy? The answer is no," said Joni Finney, vice president of the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, an independent and nonpartisan group. [/] "This sends a message that we should be monitoring this as a nation, and we don't do it," Finney said. "States have no idea about the knowledge and skills of their college graduates."

The survey examined college and university students nearing the end of their degree programs. The students did the worst on matters involving math, according to the study. [/] Almost 20 percent of students pursuing four-year degrees had only basic quantitative skills. For example, the students could not estimate if their car had enough gas to get to the service station. About 30 percent of two-year students had only basic math skills.

[…] On The Net: [/] American Institutes for Research: http://www.air.org/ [My ellipses and emphasis]


Poll Question: Send Skill Jobs Overseas? | Poll Choices:

1. Absolutely. That's where the skill is. | 2. Yes. More bang for the buck. | 3. Yes. Serves the slackers right. | 4. Yes. Regrettably. | 5. Yes. | 6. In many cases. | 7. In some cases. | 8. No. More money for education. | 9. No. Employers should train. | 10. No. Accept sloppy work. | 11. No. | 12. Other. | 13. No comment. | 14. No opinion. | 15. This poll is worthless. | 16. This poll is of negative value.

U.S. Officials Dis Bin Laden

Poor Bin Laden gets no respect these days.

From a Yahoo! AP article, Bin Laden Tape Won't Raise Security Level :

Bin Laden Tape Won't Raise Security Level By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The U.S. has no plans to raise the security threat level because of a new tape of Osama bin Laden saying al-Qaida is planning attacks, counterterrorism officials said Thursday. [/] The White House firmly rejected bin Laden's suggestion of a negotiated truce. "We don't negotiate with terrorists," Vice President Dick Cheney said in a television interview. "I think you have to destroy them."

Counterterror officials said they have seen no specific or credible intelligence to indicate an upcoming al-Qaida attack on the United States. Nor have they noticed an uptick in terrorist communications "chatter" — although that can dramatically increase or decrease immediately before an attack. [/] The audiotape, released by the Arab television network Al-Jazeera, brought new attention to the al-Qaida leader after a yearlong lull in his public statements.

[…] CIA analysts verified the recording as bin Laden's voice. They offered no details about how they reached that conclusion, but in the past the agency has verified authenticity in part by comparing new recordings to earlier messages.

Cheney said the tape showed that al-Qaida has been hobbled, because "they didn't have the ability to do anything on video" and because it had been so long since bin Laden had been heard from. [/] Still, "I think we have to assume that the threat is going to continue for a considerable period of time." the vice president said in an interview with Fox News Channel. "Even if bin Laden were no longer to be a factor, I still think we'd have problems with al-Qaida." […] [My ellipses and emphasis]

Major Saudi Joins Peace Movement

From an Aljazeera article, Bin Laden offers Americans truce :

Bin Laden offers Americans truce [/] Thursday 19 January 2006, 21:04 Makka Time, 18:04 GMT

[(]Bin Laden had not been heard from since December 2004 [/] Related: [/] Al-Zawahiri: Bin Ladin still in charge [)]

In an audio tape broadcast on Aljazeera, Osama bin Laden has warned that al-Qaida is preparing an attack very soon, but also offers Americans a long-term truce. [/] The voice, attributed to Bin Laden and apparently addressing Americans, said: "The new operations of al-Qaida has not happened not because we could not penetrate the security measures. It is being prepared and you'll see it in your homeland very soon." [/] But the voice on the tape, which appeared to be aimed at the American public, also offered a truce: "We do not mind establishing a long-term truce between us and you."

The tape, broadcast by Aljazeera on Thursday evening but dated to December last year, comes after a year of silence from the al-Qaida leader. [/] "This message is about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how to end those wars," it began.

"It was not my intention to talk to you about this, because those wars are definitely going our way. [/] "But what triggered my desire to talk to you is the continuous deliberate misinformation given by your President [George] Bush, when it comes to polls made in your home country which reveal that the majority of your people are willing to withdraw US forces from Iraq.

Americans want peace [/] "We know that the majority of your people want this war to end and opinion polls show the Americans do not want to fight the Muslims on Muslim land, nor do they want Muslims to fight them on their [US] land.

"The new operations of al-Qaida has not happened not because we could not penetrate the security measures. It is being prepared and you'll see it in your homeland very soon" [/] Osama bin Laden

"But Bush does not want this and claims that it is better to fight his enemies on their land rather than on American land. [/] "Bush tried to ignore the polls that demanded that he end the war in Iraq.

"We are getting increasingly stronger while your situation is getting from bad to worse," he told the US, referring to poor US troop morale and the huge economic losses inflicted by the war. [/] "The war in Iraq is raging and the operations in Afghanistan are increasing."

Truce offer [/] "In response to the substance of the polls in the US, which indicate that Americans do not want to fight Muslims on Muslim land, nor do they want Muslims to fight them on their land, we do not mind offering a long-term truce based on just conditions that we will stick to.

"We are a nation that Allah banned from lying and stabbing others in the back, hence both parties of the truce will enjoy stability and security to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan, which were destroyed by war.

[…] Bin Laden [/] "There is no problem in this solution, but it will prevent hundreds of billions from going to influential people and war lords in America - those who supported Bush's electoral campaign - and from this, we can understand Bush and his gang's insistence on continuing the war." [/] Addressing Americans again, he said: "If your desire for peace, stability and reconciliation was true, here we have given you the answer to your call."

US response [/] The White House said on Thursday that the US "does not negotiate with terrorists".

Bin Laden, who had not been heard of since a 27 December 2004 audiotape in which he anointed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Iraq's most wanted man, as al-Qaida's leader in Iraq, also said his network was winning the war against the US. [/] "I would like to tell you that everything is going to our advantage and the number of your dead is increasing, according to Pentagon figures." [/]

Ayman al-Zawahiri, Bin Laden's deputy, said in a September videotape that his leader [, Bin Laden,] was still alive and leading the jihad against the West. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Trivial Begets Big Standards Loss?

(See article below and Vote. at Adult Christian Forum Thread 90989)

But the star [Christopher Lee] admitted he had considered quitting the industry in protest at falling standards. [/] "I have said to my wife 'why do I bother anymore?'. Show-business has changed so much. When I started all the technicians wore a suit and shirt and a tie," he said. [/] "That's trivial. But the differences are it's now not a question of being good at your job. The people who make the decisions and give you the part or put up the money for the production are very amateurish. [/] "People don't so much make movies as make deals. They see a piece you've done and they cut your best scene, saying 'oh, it's too long'.

Lee, whose early career was associated with British horror films, is more in demand than ever with roles in the Star Wars and Lord of the Rings series.


Above quotes from a This is London article, Lee laments Hollywood 'stars'. More below:

Lee laments Hollywood 'stars' [/] By This is London [/] 19 January 2006

Veteran actor Christopher Lee has criticised the new wave of young Hollywood stars, claiming they are chosen for their looks rather than their talent [/] The 83-year-old screen legend lamented the state of modern cinema. [/] Movie bosses prize beauty and youth over acting experience, with often disastrous results, he said.

In an interview for Terry Wogan's new TV chat show, Lee said: "The problem today, and I think it's a very dangerous one for the people concerned, is that there are quite large numbers of very young men and women - boys and girls to me - from 18 to 30, and they are playing very large parts in huge films and they simply, through no fault of their own, don't have the background and the experience and the knowledge to pull if off.

"And it's dangerous for them because if they are in one failure after another, sooner or later people are going to say, 'well, he may have a pretty face but he's not bringing the public in'. [/] "So many of these good-looking - sometimes even pretty - boys and girls are getting these good roles and it's not fair on them. At some point it's going to catch up."
[…] [My ellipses and emphasis]


Poll Question: Trivial Begets Big Standards Loss? | Poll Choices:

1. Absolutely. Proper attire shows respect. | 2. Yes. Like small leaks in a dike. | 3. Yes. Happening all around us. | 4. Yes. | 5. Sometimes. | 6. No. | 7. No. Dress codes restrict freedom. | 8. No. Dress codes discriminate. | 9. No. Concentrate on big stuff. | 10. Other. | 11. No comment. | 12. No opinion. | 13. This poll is worthless. | 14. This poll is of negative value.

#1 Doom and Gloomer?

(See text below and Vote at Adult Christian Forum Thread 90979.)

[…] The 13-part series will see Sir Terry interview stars who appeared on his old BBC TV series Wogan, which went out between 1985 and 1992. [/] Besides Lee, one of the first guests will be David Icke. [/] The former Coventry City footballer and BBC sports presenter stunned the nation in 1991 by announcing on the show that he was the Son of God. [/] Wearing a turquoise shell suit, he warned that Britain would be destroyed by floods and earthquakes.

Icke, 53, has not mellowed in the intervening years. [/] He believes the world is run by 12ft lizards and claims the September 11 attacks and the London bombings are part of a global conspiracy. [/] Dressed this time in a sober black suit, he told Wogan that Prime Minister Tony Blair and US President George Bush are puppets of a sinister network which controls all of our lives. [My ellipses and emphasis]


Above quotes from last paragraphs of a This is London article, Lee laments Hollywood 'stars'.

Poll Question: #1 Doom and Gloomer? | Poll Choices:

1. Absolutely. Lizards are diabolical. | 2. Yes. Dreadful prospect. | 3. Yes. | 4. Maybe. Must study. | 5. No. | 6. No. Lizards are intelligent and friendly. | 7. No. Better puppets than out of control. | 8. Other. | 9. No comment. | 10. No opinion. | 11. This poll is worthless. | 12. This poll is of negative value.

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Pork Soup for Poor: A Hate Crime?

(See article below and Vote at Adult Christian Forum Thread 90828.)

From a Scotsman.com article, Far-right 'charity' that leaves Muslims hungry :

Tue 17 Jan 2006 [/] Far-right 'charity' that leaves Muslims hungry [/] SUSAN BELL [/] IN PARIS

FAR-right groups in France are distributing ham sandwiches and pork soup to homeless people in an attempt to discriminate against Muslims and Jews, forbidden to eat pork products. [/] Food hand-outs, which have already taken place in Paris, Nice and Nantes, and in Brussels and Charleroi in Belgium, have now spread to the eastern French city of Strasboug.

At the weekend, Strasbourg's prefect banned the extreme right association Solidarité Alsacienne from distributing its soupe au cochon (pig soup) to poor and homeless people in the city centre. [/] On Saturday, police intervened to close the soup kitchen after Solidarité Alsacienne defied the ban and began distributing food in one of Strasbourg's main squares.

Chantal Spieler, Solidarité Alsacienne's president, was escorted to police headquarters and given a formal warning before being joined by her husband, Robert Spieler, a former MP for Jean-Marie Le Pen's far-right National Front party. [/] Mr Spieler denounced "a totalitarian regime" where soon "they'll be banning salami". [/] He said: "Pork is a European symbol, whether we like it or not. The day when there are laws forbidding the distribution of pork in Alsace I believe there will be a lot of us who will leave France and take refuge in a country where there is still a certain culinary freedom." His wife said she would appeal against the prefect's decision. [/] "Pork is part of our culinary culture and we are offering the soup to everyone, so there is nothing discriminatory about it," she said.

However, few accept Solidarité Alsacienne's protests that it is a victim of the infringement of civil liberties. The association is close to Le Bloc Identitaire, an extreme-right umbrella group led by Fabrice Robert, a former leader of Unité Radicale, a neo-Nazi cell which broke up in 2002 after one its members attempted to assassinate the president, Jacques Chirac.

Soulidarieta, an extreme-right group based in Nice, which is also a Bloc Identitaire member, provoked outrage over Christmas when it began distributing soup made with pork once a week to homeless and poor people in the south-eastern city's port area. [/] Its operation drew as many protesters as homeless people. They accused the group of blatant discrimination by offering pork soup only, deliberately to exclude poor Muslims. [/] With protesters denouncing the practice as racist, the local town hall and the prefect's office in Nice claimed they were powerless to intervene as the group had done nothing illegal.

The group's head, Dominique Lescure, said pork was a traditional part of French cuisine. He did admit, however, wanting to serve the soup to his "compatriots and European homeless people". [/] The philosophy behind Soulidarieta, which means solidarity in the local dialect, is made clear in the association's literature, in which it claims: "Our people face being submerged by a rising black demographic tide," and announces "the launch of a voluntary social and political action in favour of our most deprived blood brothers". [/] The group's slogans call for "solidarity with our European brothers", and "Our own kind first before others".

Pierre Levy of the Council Representing Jewish Institutions in France, who attended the first distribution of pork soup last month, denounced Bloc Identitaire's operations as "using human misery to establish ethnic separation". [My ellipses and emphasis]

Monday, January 16, 2006

Another Cronkite-Led Retreat?

Or is the American public a bit wiser now?

From a Breitbart.com article, Cronkite: Time for U.S. to Leave Iraq :

Cronkite: Time for U.S. to Leave Iraq [/] Jan 16 1:13 AM US/Eastern [/] By DAVID BAUDER [/] AP Television Writer

PASADENA, Calif. [/] Former CBS anchor Walter Cronkite, whose 1968 conclusion that the Vietnam War was unwinnable keenly influenced public opinion then, said Sunday he'd say the same thing today about Iraq.

"It's my belief that we should get out now," Cronkite said in a meeting with reporters.

Now 89, the television journalist once known as "the most trusted man in America" has been off the "CBS Evening News" for nearly a quarter- century. He's still a CBS News employee, although he does little for them.

Cronkite said one of his proudest moments came at the end of a 1968 documentary he made following a visit to Vietnam during the Tet offensive. Urged by his boss to briefly set aside his objectivity to give his view of the situation, Cronkite said the war was unwinnable and that the U.S. should exit.

Then-President Lyndon Johnson reportedly told a White House aide after that, "If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost Middle America."

"We had an opportunity to say to the world and Iraqis after the hurricane disaster that Mother Nature has not treated us well and we find ourselves missing the amount of money it takes to help these poor people out of their homeless situation and rebuild some of our most important cities in the United States," he said. "Therefore, we are going to have to bring our troops home."

Iraqis should have been told that "our hearts are with you" and that the United States would do all it could to rebuild their country, he said.


Our hearts were with the people of Southeast Asia after the Cronkite and Johnson led the desertion of our allies there.

Probably the silliest example of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in military history.

But all the marvelous affections of American hearts did not keep a couple of million from slaughter, and millions more from oppression that remains in many ways until this day.

It would have taken arms, and courage, and some more shed blood, to do that.

Cronkite has spoken out against the Iraq war in the past, saying in 2004 that Americans weren't any safer because of the invasion. [/] Cronkite, who is hard of hearing and walks haltingly, jokingly said that "I'm standing by if they want me" to anchor the "CBS Evening News." CBS is still searching for a permanent successor to Dan Rather, who replaced Cronkite in March 1981. [/] "Twenty-four hours after I told CBS News that I was stepping down at my 65th birthday I was already regretting it and I've regretted it every day since," he said. "It's too good a job for me to have given it up the way that I did." [My ellipses and emphasis]


At least he admits to one mistake. Even Cronkite now recognizes Rather as a mistake.

Saturday, January 14, 2006

Bork: Five Best Books on the Constitution

From a WSJ Opinion Journal article, Top books on the Constitution :

FIVE BEST [/] We the People [/] Top books on the Constitution. BY ROBERT H. BORK [/] Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST

1. "The Federalist" by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay.

Written to promote the ratification of the proposed Constitution, this series of New York newspaper essays in fact had little effect on the outcome. They are, nonetheless, invaluable evidence of what leading proponents expected to be the operation and benefits of the new government as well as statements of the principles of republican government. Madison's essays, in particular, on the Union's "tendency to break and control the violence of faction" while preserving liberty are classics of American political thought. Alas, the authors failed to anticipate the political power that a judiciary entrusted with the Constitution would seize.

2. "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States" by Joseph Story (Hillard, Gray & Co., 1833).

Joseph Story, who produced this work while he was both a justice of the Supreme Court and a professor of law at Harvard, plainly lays out what the Constitution meant to the generation after the Founding. Story rejected the judicial activism advocated by some in his time: "A constitution of government is addressed to the common sense of the people; and never was designed for trials of logical skill, or visionary speculation." He offered rules of interpretation to avoid giving the Constitution "an extent and elasticity, subversive of all rational boundaries." The modern Supreme Court has nonetheless assigned to the Constitution an elasticity that is stretching it to as yet unknown dimensions.

3. "The Least Dangerous Branch" by Alexander M. Bickel (Bobbs-Merrill, 1962).

Alexander Bickel attempted to resolve the central problem of constitutional law: Our political ethos is majoritarian, but the court, possessing the power to nullify laws democratically enacted, is countermajoritarian. The problem becomes acute when the court imposes principles not to be found in the Constitution. Mr. Bickel justified that role by saying that courts should apply principles drawn from the "evolving morality of our tradition." Written gracefully and offering many insights into constitutional doctrines, this book is the most intellectually honest, if unsuccessful, defense of non-originalism of which I am aware.

4. "The Rise of Modern Judicial Review" by Christopher Wolfe (Basic Books, 1986).

Christopher Wolfe addresses a transformation in constitutional law that "The Federalist" and Joseph Story could not have foreseen and that Alexander Bickel, despite his attempt to justify a modest non-originalism, deplored. The book traces judicial supremacy from its early "moderate traditional form" to the modern era, in which many judges think that the historic Constitution "does not contain sufficient constitutional (judicially enforceable) protection for liberty and equality," thus requiring them to revise and even overrule the Framers' intentions. Mr. Wolfe's critique of the court and the academic defenders of its activism defies easy summation precisely because of its comprehensiveness, erudition and analytical rigor.

5. "Separation of Church and State" by Philip Hamburger (Harvard University, 2002).

What Mr. Wolfe does regarding the excesses of judicial activism in general, Mr. Hamburger does for the many distortions of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. He devastates Jefferson's notion of a "wall of separation" between religion and government, demonstrating that such a notion was utterly idiosyncratic at the time. Strict separation was revived by anti-Catholics in the 19th century and picked up by the court in the 20th, a development for which Justice Hugo Black bore much responsibility. The modern era of judicial hostility to organized religion and its symbols in the public square is directly contrary to what the Framers meant when they prohibited the establishment of religion. Though Mr. Hamburger does not trace the damage done by preposterous decisions in recent decades, this is a marvelous book.

Mr. Bork, a fellow of the Hudson Institute, is editor of "A Country I Do Not Recognize: The Legal Assault on American Values" (Hoover, 2005). [My ellipses and emphasis]

Sexist Rant of the Century, So Far

From a New York Daily News article, Steamed about Rice:

Steamed about Rice, [/] Russian pol unleashes rant

Russian pol Vladimir Zhirinovsky says what Condi needs is a man. [/] Condoleezza Rice might want to see if there's room in one of those "black site" terror-suspect prisons for Russian politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky. [/] The wacko leader of Russia's Liberal and Democratic Party has surpassed his earlier screeds with a misogynist attack on our secretary of state.

Speaking with Pravda this week, Zhirinovsky chastised Rice for calling on Russia to "act responsibly" in supplying natural gas to Ukraine. [/] The fascistic pol attributed that "coarse anti-Russian statement" to Rice being "a single woman who has no children." [/] "If she has no man by her side at her age, he will never appear," Zhirinovsky ranted on. "Condoleezza Rice needs a company of soldiers. She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied.

"Condoleezza Rice is a very cruel, offended woman who lacks men's attention," he added. "Such women are very rough. … They can be happy only when they are talked and written about everywhere: 'Oh, Condoleezza, what a remarkable woman, what a charming Afro-American lady! How well she can play the piano and speak Russian!' [/] "Complex-prone women are especially dangerous. They are like malicious mothers-in-law, women that evoke hatred and irritation with everyone. Everybody tries to part with such women as soon as possible. A mother-in-law is better than a single and childless political persona, though."

A State Department spokesman told us Rice would not "dignify the article with a response."

Zhirinovsky has made no secret of his insanity in the past. Besides praising Hitler and encouraging the use of nuclear weapons, he has advocated Russia's invasion and "reacquisition" of Alaska. To eradicate bird flu, he's suggested arming every Russian and ordering them to shoot everything with feathers. Perhaps we could fit him with a Big Bird costume. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Iraq Judge Follows Ito Precedent

(And also the precedent of those U.S. Supreme Court Justices who have recently cited the laws of other countries in deciding cases under the Constitution of the United States).

Judge Ito of California established the great principle of the absolute right of a judge to bizarre behavior without interference from the executive branch of government.

(Judge Ito is also celebrated for being the inspiration for a dance group which became a big hit on its first appearance on national television.)

From the current Drudge Report article, Front Page:

Saddam judge to quit over govt pressure

The chief judge in the trial of Saddam Hussein has tendered his resignation in protest at pressure from the Iraqi government on himself and the court... 'He had complaints from the government that he was being too soft in dealing with Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants. They (government leaders) want things to go faster'...


From a Breitbart.com article, Chief Saddam Judge Submits Resignation :

Chief Saddam Judge Submits Resignation [/] Jan 14 11:43 AM US/Eastern [/] By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA [/] Associated Press Writer [/] BAGHDAD, Iraq

The chief judge in the Saddam Hussein trial has submitted his resignation, a court official said Saturday. It wasn't immediately clear if the resignation had been accepted.

Rizgar Mohammed Amin, the presiding judge of a five-judge tribunal overseeing the Saddam case, submitted his resignation, a court official told The Associated Press on Saturday on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak to the media. [My ellipses and emphasis]

Friday, January 13, 2006

N.Y. Times: Leading the Death March?

(See text below and Vote { - many interesting choices} at Adult Christian Forum Thread 90634.)

The elites of the modern West have been given a choice (largely economic they believe) between bareness and terminal discomfort.

They have chosen bareness. They shall have terminal discomfort.

As they might have understood, had they paid more attention to: Abraham and Sarah, Zachariah and Elizabeth, and Jeptha's daughter.

From a New York Times article, Come October, Baby Will Make 300 Million or So :

January 13, 2006 [\] Come October, Baby Will Make 300 Million or So [\] By SAM ROBERTS
If the experts are right, some time this month, perhaps somewhere in the suburban South or West, a couple, most likely white Anglo-Saxon Protestants or Hispanic, will conceive a baby who, when born in October, will become the 300 millionth American.

As of yesterday, the Census Bureau officially pegged the resident population of the United States at closing in on 297,900,000. The bureau estimates that with a baby being born every 8 seconds, someone dying every 12 seconds and the nation gaining an immigrant every 31 seconds on average, the population is growing by one person every 14 seconds.

At that rate, the total is expected to top 300 million late this year. But with those projections adjusted monthly and the number of births typically peaking during the summer, the benchmark is likely to be reached about nine months from now.

"You end up with a number in October," said Katrina Wengert, a demographer and a keeper of the Census Bureau's official Population Clock, getting about as specific as possible this far in advance in a field subject to chronic fudging and revising. The clock is, itself, a contrivance, of course, but no more so than other pretexts for a wintertime sexual encounter.


According to the Times, all pretexts for wintertime sexual encounters are contrivances.

One hopes that they have more life-enhancing views of other seasons.

Still one can be thankful that the Times has, inadvertently undoubtedly, given some a marvelous "pretext" for "wintertime sexual encounter[s]": begetting living American number 300,000,000.

Rest assured that hospital publicists, canny obstetricians, entrepreneurial chambers of commerce, baby food manufacturers, public officials and countless others pursuing some political social or personal agenda, abetted by the media, are already guesstimating the growth rate to anoint any number of unsuspecting newborns as the mythical American who pushed the nation's population to 300 million.


According to the Times, it is only those "countless" groups and persons " pursuing some political social or personal agenda " that are in favor of our Nation having more babies.

Not any agenda-less normal married couples or other agenda-less normal human beings.

[…] That same year, [1967, when 200,000,000 was reached,] David E. Lilienthal, the former chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, warned in The New York Times that unbridled population growth might doom the nation to shortages of water and energy, bury it in pollution and saddle it with unmanageable poverty. "A population of at least 300 million by 2000 will, I now believe, threaten the very quality of life of individual Americans," he wrote.

Projections are subject to unimaginable imponderables - from the impact of wars and epidemics to dramatic gains in life expectancy. It has taken 230 years for the United States to reach 300 million people (the total number of people who have ever lived in America is obviously much higher). The Census Bureau projects that even with the nation growing more slowly than ever beginning in 2030, the population will top 400 million less than 40 years from now. [My ellipses and emphasis]


Instead of noting the obvious, that the 1967 prediction was ridiculously wrong.

And that we can expect similar predictions today to be ridiculously wrong.

The Times blows a big smokescreen of what they are pleased to call "unimaginable imponderables".

"Dramatic gains in life expectancy" are predictable and the predictions have been pretty good.

"Wars and epidemics", particularly catastrophic ones, are difficult to predict. But their "impact" is obviously not an "unimaginable imponderable".

"Spin, spin, spin" is getting rather close to "Lie, lie, lie".

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Alito's Questioners: Clowns or Geese?

(See article below and Vote at Adult Christian Forum Thread 90485.)

From a New York Post article, ALITO & THE CLOWNS :

ALITO & THE CLOWNS [/] January 11, 2006

PERHAPS Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee could rally to defeat Samuel Alito's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. But to do so, they'd have to conduct themselves like intelligent adversaries, rather than behaving like a gaggle of boorish, clownish, hectoring geese. [/] They would have to ask him probing questions that might lead Alito to contradict himself or back himself into a legal corner. They would have to engage in quick question-and-answer sessions in which they sought to make the nominee agree or disagree to various propositions and act disappointed if he tried to evade them. [/] Mostly, they'd have to stop talking and let Alito talk — because the only way Alito can be defeated is for Alito to defeat himself.

But Alito's opponents on the committee are just too deeply in love with the sounds of their own voices and too deeply limited by their own limited understanding of constitutional law to give the judge a run for his money.

Welcome to the court, Justice Alito. Your ascension is a foregone conclusion, thanks in large measure to people like Sen. Joseph Biden.

Yesterday, the Delaware Democrat delivered one of the most inadvertently hilarious performances in the history of televised hearings. [/] Each senator got 30 minutes to question Alito. Biden said his opening statement would be brief. It went on for 14 minutes. [/] […] [/] We learned also about his expansive definition of discrimination in the 21st century. "Can you tell me how you can tell the difference when an employer is saying, 'Ms. Feinstein, I am not going to hire you because the person seeking the job has a Rhodes scholarship and I like him better,' and it turns out they weren't a Rhodes scholar? The real reason is, 'I just don't like your glasses. I do not like the way you look.' And I'm not being facetious . . ."

No, alas for Biden, he was not being facetious. What he was being was asinine. Biden's courageous stance on behalf of myopic Americans might come as welcome news to a nearsighted person such as myself, but it had nothing to do with the ideological fight he was trying to pick with Alito. [/] Biden was trying to make the point that Alito had an excessively cramped and comfortable way of defining discrimination. But his inability to control his flapping gums caused the hearing room to burst into confused laughter.

In the course of Biden's questioning, Alito spoke for maybe four or five minutes, while Biden ran on for 25. This is not how you defeat a formidable adversary. [/] Nor do you defeat a smart and sober judge like Alito by looking down at a list of questions and reading through them as though you were a court stenographer asked to read back someone else's testimony. That's what Herb Kohl, the Wisconsin Democrat, did. Absurdly.

And you don't defeat a clever and substantive judge like Alito by archly demanding to know why on earth he would rule that it would be acceptable to strip-search a 10-year-old, as both Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Ted Kennedy of Chappaquiddick (oops, sorry, Massachusetts) did. Because when you do so, you give Alito the opportunity to knock one out of the park against you, as Alito did: [/] "Senator," Alito said to Leahy, "I wasn't happy that a 10-year-old was searched. Now, there wasn't any claim in this case that the search was carried out in any sort of an abusive fashion. It was carried out by a female officer . . . [But] I don't think there should be a Fourth Amendment rule . . . that minors can never be searched. Because if we had a rule like that, then where would drug dealers hide their drugs? That would lead to greater abuse of minors." [/] In your face, Pat Leahy. [/] In any case, as Alito also explained, the search of the 10-year-old wasn't the issue his court had been asked to adjudicate. The court was seeking to determine how far the search warrant in the case extended.

Over the course of hours and hours of testimony, the calm and measured Alito sat as he was hectored, badgered and lectured by senators who seemed far less capable of making reasoned judgments than the man whose nomination the Constitution requires them to judge. [/] To defeat Alito, they'd have to be his equal. Instead, they came across as his intellectual and temperamental inferiors.

If I were a Democrat, I'd be sickened by the inability of my party's leaders to figure out how to argue with a conservative jurist.

On the other hand, if I were a Democrat and heard just how incompetently my party's leaders were able to conduct an argument with a conservative jurist, I might start listening more intently and with more respect to the ideas of the conservative jurist. Like John Roberts before him, Alito has the better of the argument.
That might be because they have the better arguments. / E-mail: podhorez@nypost.com [My ellipses and emphasis]

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Lots of Fun at J. Edgar's Wake

How petty and silly all this stuff now seems.

From a WSJ Opinion Journal article, FBI FILES :

FBI FILES [/] Hoover's Institution [/] Anecdotes from the FBI crypt--and lessons on how to win the war. [/] BY LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN [/] Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT

I recently completed a rewarding year as co-chairman of President Bush's commission on intelligence, and I propose to discuss our recommendations regarding the FBI in light of my own unique experience with J. Edgar Hoover.

[…] I was shocked then, when on Jan. 19, 1975, as acting attorney general, I read a front page story in the Washington Post confirming the existence of the files. The story pointed out that the files contained embarrassing material collected on congressmen. When I confronted Kelly, he was initially mystified. He then realized the Post must be referring to files in his outer office, in plain sight, which he had inherited but never examined. Sure enough, they were the notorious secret and confidential files of J. Edgar Hoover.

The House Judiciary Committee demanded I testify about those files, so I was obliged to read them. Accompanied by only one FBI official, I read virtually all these files in three weekends. It was the single worst experience of my long governmental service. Hoover had indeed tasked his agents with reporting privately to him any bits of dirt on figures such as Martin Luther King, or their families. Hoover sometimes used that information for subtle blackmail to ensure his and the bureau's power.

I intend to take to my grave nasty bits of information on various political figures--some still active. As bad as the dirt collection business was, perhaps even worse was the evidence that he had allowed--even offered--the bureau to be used by presidents for nakedly political purposes. I have always thought that the most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage is to use its law enforcement machinery for political ends.

[…] Only a few weeks before the 1964 election, a powerful presidential assistant, Walter Jenkins, was arrested in a men's room in Washington. Evidently, the president was concerned that Barry Goldwater would use that against him in the election. Another assistant, Bill Moyers, was tasked to direct Hoover to do an investigation of Goldwater's staff to find similar evidence of homosexual activity. Mr. Moyers' memo to the FBI was in one of the files.

When the press reported this, I received a call in my office from Mr. Moyers. Several of my assistants were with me. He was outraged; he claimed that this was another example of the Bureau salting its files with phony CIA memos. I was taken aback. I offered to conduct an investigation, which if his contention was correct, would lead me to publicly exonerate him. There was a pause on the line and then he said, "I was very young. How will I explain this to my children?" And then he rang off. I thought to myself that a number of the Watergate figures, some of whom the department was prosecuting, were very young, too.

Other presidents, according to those files, misused the bureau, although never Truman and Eisenhower. But Johnson clearly was the most demanding. This discovery was particularly painful for me. Although I was a life-long Republican, I had not only voted for LBJ, I had signed an ad supporting him, which got me ejected from the Hawaii Young Republicans.

[…] Some of Johnson's suspicions of the Kennedys were rather amusing. He became convinced that the Washington Star was secretly owned by the Kennedy family and that is why he received less favorable coverage from the Star than from the Post. He insisted that Hoover unearth those connections. Hoover plaintively tried to explain that the Star was owned by the Kauffmann family and that they were Republicans.

But surely the most bizarre episode that I discovered (and can reveal) involves the investigation and trial of Bobby Baker, who had been LBJ's top Senate aide. To say that the president was apprehensive about this episode would be a dramatic understatement. The investigation and trial took place when Bobby Kennedy was attorney general and Jack Miller the assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division. During the investigation of Baker's Senate activities, Miller asked the FBI to wire a potential witness. To his astonishment Hoover responded with the ridiculous assertion that it would be improper.

Of course, Hoover promptly reported this to LBJ as he had many activities of the Kennedy Justice Department. However, Miller was not to be deterred. With Kennedy's approval he called a special assistant to Treasury Secretary Henry Fowler to gain help from Treasury agents. The assistant arranged the help and Baker was convicted. Much later, toward the end of the Johnson administration, Hoover discovered Miller's end-around and duly reported it to LBJ, who, furious, demanded that Fowler fire the assistant. Fowler refused. That assistant was Robert Jordan, my Harvard Law School classmate, subsequently general counsel of the Army and later my partner at Steptoe & Johnson.

[…] Mr. Silberman was co-chairman of President Bush's Commission on Intelligence Capabilities. This is adapted from a speech he delivered recently to the First Circuit Judicial Conference. [My ellipses and emphasis]

The Power of His Resurrection

From a forum:

{{___ There is power of His resurection.
{{___ Php 3:10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
{{___ But where does this power come from? Scripture says this resurected power comes from the Jesus Christ and His finished work of the cross.
{{___ 1Co 1:18 -For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
{{___ Many songs have been written about resurection power but this is like writting a song about the sun rising instead of writting a song about the creator of the sun Jesus Christ. The power that gave resurection is the power of the cross and the resurection power is noting other than the power of the Jesus Christ and His finished work of the cross.}}

2 Corinthians 5:17 KJV Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.

The meta-nominal Christian is a new creation, a precursor, along with his resurrected Lord, of the new heavens and new earth to come. As such, his new kind of life, eternal life, is an embodiment of the power of the resurrection. Already in use. And usable through faith to do more. To walk in those good works which God has already prepared for him to walk in. The following verses expand on this new kind of life and its source:

Galatians 2:20 KJV I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
Romans 6:4 KJV Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Romans 8:10 KJV And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.
Colossians 3:3 KJV For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.

You chose a good passage to illustrate the power of the resurrection. Unfortunately, that part of Philippians suffers even more that the above passages from a traditional lack of certitude about the believers position both in translation and interpretation.

Philippians 3:8-10 KJV Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, (9) And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith: (10) That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;

The sense of the passage in the original language is:

Philippians 3:8-10 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: through whom I have had all things removed, (and I do count them but dung,) in order that I might have Christ as gain, (9) And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith: (10) That I might know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, having been made (and being made) conformable unto his death;

It is the new birth that accomplishes these things, not the heroic sanctity of Paul, as is traditionally inferred.

It is faith in having been crucified with Christ, having died (in fact not figure, physically as well as spiritually, despite the lack of physical evidence) in Christ, that leads to faith in the ability to walk in the good works already prepared for each, the ability to share the fellowship of His sufferings and the power of His resurrection.

2 Corinthians 4:10 KJV Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.