If you cannot trust a Duke classics professor’s analysis …
Which just goes to show that just about anyone can figure out what is in the healthcare bill, if they just take the time to read it.[/] In any case, Mr. Lewis represents the best of Americans being citizens – and, alas, citizen journalists. [My emphasis]
From a Sweetness – Light .com blog post, What The Health Care Bill Actually Says, more below:
A regular little shop of horrors, actually. Does the Lord High Executioner have a little list of those who never will be missed? Life continues to imitate art.
I report and link. You decide. - BJon
Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God. - Psalms 20:7
More from a What The Health Care Bill Actually Says:
What The Health Care Bill Actually Says[/] Here is a long but we believe helpful analysis of HR 3200 from the site, Classical Ideals, by John David Lewis:[/] The Health Care Bill: What HR 3200, ‘‘America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009,” Says John David Lewis[/] August 6, 2009
What does the bill, HR 3200, short-titled ‘‘America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009,” actually say about major health care issues? I here pose a few questions in no particular order, citing relevant passages and offering a brief evaluation after each set of passages.
This bill is 1017 pages long. It is knee-deep in legalese and references to other federal regulations and laws. I have only touched pieces of the bill here. For instance, I have not considered the establishment of (1) “Health Choices Commissio0ner” (Section 141); (2) a “Health Insurance Exchange,” (Section 201), basically a government run insurance scheme to coordinate all insurance activity; (3) a Public Health Insurance Option (Section 221); and similar provisions.
This is the evaluation of someone who is neither a physician nor a legal professional. I am citizen, concerned about this bill’s effects on my freedom as an American. I would rather have used my time in other ways—but this is too important to ignore.
We may answer one question up front: How will the government will pay for all this? Higher taxes, more borrowing, printing money, cutting payments, or rationing services—there are no other options. We will all pay for this, enrolled in the government “option” or not.
[...] WILL THE PLAN RATION MEDICAL CARE?[/] This is what the bill says, pages 284-288, SEC. 1151. REDUCING POTENTIALLY PREVENTABLE HOSPITAL READMISSIONS:
(ii) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN READMISSIONS.—For purposes of clause (i), with respect to a hospital, excess readmissions shall not include readmissions for an applicable condition for which there are fewer than a minimum number (as determined by the Secretary) of discharges for such applicable condition for the applicable period and such hospital.[/] and, under “Definitions”:[/] (A) APPLICABLE CONDITION.—The term ‘applicable condition’ means, subject to subparagraph (B), a condition or procedure selected by the Secretary . . . and:[/]
(E) READMISSION.—The term ‘readmission’ means, in the case of an individual who is discharged from an applicable hospital, the admission of the individual to the same or another applicable hospital within a time period specified by the Secretary from the date of such discharge.
and:[/] (6) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, section 1878, or otherwise of— . . .[/] (C) the measures of readmissions . . .EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:[/] 1. This section amends the Social Security Act[/] 2. The government has the power to determine what constitutes an “applicable [medical] condition.”[/] 3. The government has the power to determine who is allowed readmission into a hospital.[/] 4. This determination will be made by statistics: when enough people have been discharged for the same condition, an individual may be readmitted.[/] 5. This is government rationing, pure, simple, and straight up.[/] 6. There can be no judicial review of decisions made here. The Secretary is above the courts.[/] 7. The plan also allows the government to prohibit hospitals from expanding without federal permission: page 317-318.
Will the plan punish Americans who try to opt out?[/]
What the bill says, pages 167-168, section 401, TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE:[/] (a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of—[/] (1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over[/] (2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer. . . .[/]
EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGE:[/] 1. This section amends the Internal Revenue Code.[/] 2. Anyone caught without acceptable coverage and not in the government plan will pay a special tax.[/] 3. The IRS will be a major enforcement mechanism for the plan.
[...] Mr. Lewis is a professor of classics at Duke University.[/] Which just goes to show that just about anyone can figure out what is in the healthcare bill, if they just take the time to read it.[/] In any case, Mr. Lewis represents the best of Americans being citizens – and, alas, citizen journalists.[/] This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Wednesday, August 12th, 2009 at 12:16 am. You can leave a response. [\] 9 Responses to “What The Health Care Bill Actually Says” [...] [My ellipses and emphasis]
