'Why does it take two reporters to write this "article"?'
Bush Condemns Report on Bank Records
Watch for the TV clip. You'll never see him madder
Above from Lucianne.com "Must Reads of the day". Read L dot comment thread below to discover answer to:
'Why does it take two reporters to write this "article"?'
(Source article at The New York Times, article link, Bush Condemns Report on Bank Records)
Bush Condemns Report on Bank Records [/] The New York Times, by ANNE E. KORNBLUT and JOHN O'NEIL
[From] Original Article [/] Posted By:Thorn, 6/26/2006 1:50:06 PM
WASHINGTON, June 26 — President Bush today condemned as "disgraceful" the disclosure last week of a secret program that seeks to investigate and block terrorists by tracing financial records through a banking consortium in Brussels.Comments: And that's putting it mildly.
Reply 1 - Posted by: paboo, 6/26/2006 1:55:09 PM
This, and similar, security breaches demand prosecution. Otherwise, we will continue to suffer more damage to our war effort. It is a war, and our nation's survival is at stake. If we loose this war, we'll never win another.Reply 2 - Posted by: GoPack, 6/26/2006 1:55:38 PM
Why, in leftoid thinking, is leaking a secret like Valerie Plame's identity (which was of no consequence to anything) a crime, but publishing a secret like how we track terrorists, not? My head hurts.Reply 3 - Posted by: Cavallodifiero, 6/26/2006 1:56:18 PM
While he has is condemning pen in his hand why doesn't he write Mexico's name on the pad and for good measure start evicting illegal invaders from Mexico on a regular basis. Not 2000 here and 2000 there thinking that people will shut up and go away.Reply 4 - Posted by: ZurichMike, 6/26/2006 2:04:29 PM
Why does it take two reporters to write this "article"?Reply 5 - Posted by: Thorn, 6/26/2006 2:07:53 PM
One to write it and the other to email it to Bin Laden.
It is only fair and compassionate to give deranged victims of severe oppression, presently cut off from normal communication by insensitive Bush policies of unknown legality, some compensating compassionate communication in the name of fairness and niceness and of complete and comprehensive cultural and personal equality.
