Saturday, January 04, 2014

Proverbs 9:10-12 ++C Undeserved Suffering

Pro 9:10-12 NKJ  "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, And the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding. 11 For by me your days will be multiplied, And years of life will be added to you. 12 If you are wise, you are wise for yourself, And if you scoff, you will bear it alone."
[This post is a work in progress. I wanted to use Reftagger to study His Grace's post before adding my own comments. Have a look at His Grace's post with Reftagger and come back in a day or two, Lord willing, for my comments.]
"Why does it always rain on me ?"
[Archbishop Cranmer web log post | 1/4/14 | http://bit.ly/1kiHfEB ]
The title of this meditation is taken from a song by the Scottish band Travis. In the subsequent line, he asks: "Is it because I lied when I was seventeen?" – an expression of the pervasive belief in exact retribution, consistent with Proverbs 9:10-12. The perfect equation of sin with judgment is as prevalent in 20th-21st-century pop culture as it was in Job’s day. The principal plea of those who suffer disaster and trauma is "Why me?" or "What have I done to deserve this?", and the easy and comforting answer is to believe that the suffering is deserved; that some personal wickedness or sin was its cause, because associated guilt places the catastrophe in a comprehensible universal order, namely that suffering is explicable in terms of punishment.
Job shares the premise of his friends that because God is just, He rewards the righteous and punishes the guilty, which is why Job can make no sense of his own suffering (Job 10:5-7). "Behold, I cry out of wrong, but I am not heard: I cry aloud, but there is no judgment’ (Job 19:7).
It is not easy to square God's promises of prosperity for the faithful and hardship for the disobedient with the reality that Travis sings about. How does one equate Psalm 146:1-10 with Job 24:1-12, or Deuteronomy 30:15-20 with Ecclesiastes 8:14-9:4? The author of the Book of Job clashes directly with the ideology of Proverbs, and so, many conclude, "the Bible is just full of contradictions". Proverbs seems to say, “Here are the rules for life; try them and find that they will work.” Job and Ecclesiastes say, “We did, and they don’t.”
But Job isn’t necessarily a contradiction to Proverbs; more a modification or qualification. Proverbial expressions of natural retribution are something most will understand: eating junk food results in heart attacks, or smoking gives you lung cancer. But Proverbs does not attempt to reconcile the contradictions of experience. Thus when poverty is linked to laziness or folly (Prov 6: 6-11; 10:4f; 21:17,21,25), it is easy to conclude that laziness results in poverty; or worse, that poverty is always the result of laziness.
But this is to ignore that righteous people are afflicted by suffering (Psa 13:1-6). By separating calamity from moral wrongdoing, there is an alleviation of associated guilt, and thus illness and disease, death or disaster need not necessarily cast discredit on the victim. Proverbs speaks truth, but the lesson from Job is not to apply it dogmatically or simplistically.
Job’s friends repeatedly state that all humans are flawed by sin and none is pure (Job 4:17-21, 15:14, 25:4-6), and Job shares this view (Job 1:5, 14:1-4), and does not therefore claim to be sinless (cf Job 7:21, 13:26, 14:16f). This appears to contradict his claims elsewhere (Job 9:15,20, 10:1-7) to be innocent. It has to be assumed that the prevailing theory of retribution held by Job and his friends was that God’s punishments and rewards were in proportion to man’s sin or righteousness - a theory which has been perpetuated throughout church and literary history: "I am a man more sinned against than sinning", cries King Lear.
Job clings to the deeply-held belief that he is innocent of anything which may have deserved calamity and suffering on such a massive scale. His experience moves him beyond a limiting theology, and opens his eyes to the fact that the wicked are rarely punished (ch [Job 21:1-34]) and the oppressed are rarely comforted (Job 24:1-12). Job ultimately allows his experience to modify his theological dogma, while his friends cling to their dogma against all the evidence.
His Grace has received an email telling him that these present floods and interminable downpours are God's judgment upon a sinful and rebellious nation.
No, they absolutely and unequivocally are not.
Firstly, God promised never to do that again (Gen 9:11-17); and secondly, the books of wisdom found in the Bible suggest that the wicked may prosper while the righteous suffer. Job’s counsellors were of most use when they sat with him in silence for seven days (Job 2:13). Though their understanding of suffering was partial, in their silence they moved towards empathy and understanding.
Mankind is unable to locate and obtain wisdom (Job 28:12-22), but God ‘established it and searched it out’ (vv [Job 28:23-27]) when he created the universe. In this context, wisdom appears to be the deepest principle underlying the cosmos, and silence is perhaps an appropriate reverent response. Communication with the Divine is, however, possible throughout suffering. God may be the justifiable object of wrath, impatience or grief, and He may rightly be blamed, for He is ultimately the origin of the suffering (Job 42:2), so if a victim’s encounter with God is pierced with hatred and resentment, so be it. It is, at least, an honest encounter and is commendable (Job 42:7f).
Job 33:1-33 is said to contain the one real insight into a human understanding of woe: Elihu’s constructive view of suffering (vv [Job 33:14ff]), and the need for a mediator to help make sense of it all (vv [Job 33:23-28]) - a gracious minister of rebuke and guidance, leading the sufferer to joyous restoration. Elihu contributes the idea that suffering can be a discipline (vv [Job 33:16-30] cf Job 36:9-15), and thereby makes a valuable contribution to its positive and constructive aspects.
But theodicy - the justification of God - is a complex area of theology. Job clings to the notion that, contrary to appearances, God is just. He is absolutely certain that he will be vindicated (Job 19:25) and it is possible that he believes his vindicator to be God. Job’s world may lie in ruins, but there is a deeply held conviction that ultimately God acts justly. He may be a present enemy (Job 19:8-12), but Job’s complete human isolation turns him to God as the only possible source of his vindication. Reaching out to the supernatural is a normal human reaction when faith in humanity and earthly order has been destroyed by trauma and isolation.
There are many struggles involved in any journey from despair to trust. Although God avoids all the questions that Job and his friends threw up, He lovingly leads his son beyond the horizons of his own world of suffering. By God’s word the healing is effected. Christians are charged with instilling a hope in those who suffer loss or bereavement, to help them find meaning for a continuing existence in a world of fading certainties.
No one is comforted or helped by the crass assertion that tempests and floods are the result of God sitting in judgment upon our rebellion.
Posted byArchbishop Cranmer at 11:25 am Permalink [ http://bit.ly/1kiHfEB ] [My emphasis and my minor marked or unmarked changes largely for Bible reference compatibility with Reftagger on my web log copy.]
Archbishop Cranmer home page link: http://bit.ly/194bHgI

"ABOUT HIS GRACE: [/] Archbishop Cranmer takes as his inspiration the words of Sir Humphrey Appleby: [Secretary of the Cabinet under UK Prime Minister Jim Hacker] ‘It’s interesting,’ he observes, ‘that nowadays politicians want to talk about moral issues, and bishops want to talk politics.’ [] It is the fusion of the two in public life, and the necessity for a wider understanding of their complex symbiosis, which leads His Grace to write on these very sensitive issues. "

I2C 140104a Pro 9v10to12 pp C Undeserved Suffering / I2C / 140104 1616 / Proverbs 9:10-12 ++C Undeserved Suffering