_
Imaginary dominions also collapse. As the Marxist error of assuming
an inevitable dictatorship of the proletariat. In practice a
dictatorship of the lumpen proletariat results from the various forms
of this madness. As the adoption of a religion which explicitly
denies the deity of Jesus and the obvious moral superiority of the
average man to its Prophet has resulted in an obvious inferiority of
culture. So also the imaginary world of our undocumented and very
impeachable president is working out obvious evil.
The
end of Obamaworld
wnd.com
[by Pat Buchanan /] http://j.mp/0EndOworld
[/] or http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/the-end-of-obamaworld/
In
denouncing Republicans as “scared of widows and orphans” and
castigating those who prefer Christian refugees to Muslims coming to
America, Barack Obama has come off as petulant and unpresidential.
Clearly,
he is upset. And with good reason.
He
grossly, transparently underestimated the ability of ISIS, the JV
team, to strike outside the caliphate into the heart of the West, and
has egg all over his face. More critically, the liberal world order
he has been preaching and predicting is receding before our eyes.
Suddenly,
his rhetoric is discordantly out of touch with reality. And, for his
time on the global stage, the phrase “failed president” comes to
mind.
What
happened in Paris, said President Obama, “was an attack on all of
humanity and the universal values that we share.”
And
just what might those “universal values” be?
At
a soccer game between Turkey and Greece in Istanbul, Turks booed
during the moment of silence for the Paris dead and chanted “Allahu
Akbar.” Among 1.6 billion Muslims, hundreds of millions do not
share our values regarding women’s rights, abortion, homosexuality,
free speech, or the equality of all religious faiths.
Set
aside the fanatics of ISIS. Does Saudi Arabia share Obama’s views
and values regarding sexual freedom and the equality of Christianity,
Judaism and Islam? Is anything like the First Amendment operative
across the Sunni or Shiite world, or in China?
In
their belief in the innate superiority of their Islamic faith and the
culture and civilization it created, Muslims have more in common with
our confident Christian ancestors who conquered them than with gauzy
global egalitarians like Barack Obama.
“Liberté,
egalité, fraternité,” the values of secular France, are no more
shared by the Islamic world than is France’s affection for Charlie
Hebdo.
Across
both Europe and the United States, the lurch away from liberalism, on
immigration, borders and security, fairly astonishes.
But
again, understandably so.
Many
of the Muslim immigrants in Britain, France and Germany have never
assimilated. Within these countries are huge enclaves of the
alienated and their militant offspring.
Consider
the Belgium capital of Brussels. Belgium’s home affairs minister,
Jan Jambon, said his government does not “have control of the
situation in Molenbeek.”
Brice
De Ruyver, a security adviser to a former Belgian prime minister
says, “We don’t officially have no-go zones in Brussels,
but in reality, there are, and they are in Molenbeek.”
According
to the Wall Street Journal, after the Paris attacks, “French
security forces … conducted hundreds of anti-terror raids and
placed more than 100 suspects under arrest. … France has some
11,500 names on government watch lists.”
How
many of those 11,500 are of Arab descent or the Muslim faith?
Order
Pat Buchanan’s brilliant and prescient books at WND’s Superstore.
The
nations of the EU are beginning to look again at their borders, and
who is crossing them, who is coming in, and who is already there.
And
the world is reawakening to truths long suppressed. Race and religion
matter. To some they are life-and-death matters. Not all creeds,
cultures and tribes are equally or easily assimilated into a Western
nation. And First World nations have a right to preserve their own
unique identity and character.
When
Obama says that to prefer Christian to Muslim refugees is
“un-American,” he is saying that all the U.S. immigration laws
enacted before 1965 were un-American. And, so, too, were presidents
like Calvin Coolidge who signed laws that virtually restricted
immigration to Europeans.
Barack
Obama may be our president, but who is this man of the left to
dictate to us what is “un-American”?
Were
presidents Harry Truman and Woodrow Wilson, who called ours a
“Christian nation,” un-American? Did the Supreme Court
uphold our “universal values” with Roe v. Wade in 1973 and the
Obergefell decision on same-sex marriage last June?
The
race issue, too, has returned to divide us.
Half
a century after Selma bridge, we have “Black Lives Matter!” on
college campuses claiming that universities like Missouri, Princeton,
Yale and Dartmouth are riddled with institutional racism.
Attention
must be paid, and reparations made, by white America. And a new
generation of academic appeasers advances to grovel and ask how the
university might make amends.
In
Europe, tribalism and nationalism are on the march. Peoples and
nations wish to preserve who they are. Some have begun to
establish checkpoints and ignore the Schengen Agreement mandating
open borders. Eastern Europeans have had all the diversity they
can stand.
With
Syrian passports missing, with ISIS besieged in its Syria-Iraq laager
and urging suicide attacks in New York and Washington, we may be
witness to more terrorist massacres and murders in the States.
The
time may be at hand for a moratorium on all immigration and a
rewriting of the immigration laws to reflect the views and values of
Middle Americans, rather than those of a morally arrogant
multicultural elite.
Obamaworld
is gone. We live again in an us-versus-them country in an
us-versus-them world. And we shall likely never know another. [My
emphasis.]
I2C
151120aa Isa13v19 End of Oworld | I2C | 151120 0939 et
