_
The estimable Frank Miele of the Daily Interlake watched the CNBC
presidential candidate debate debacle so that we did not need to.
“Finally, someone writes the proper epitaph for the GOP
debate that wasn't.” - Lucianne.com Must
Reads [and picture of the day – see below] (After 11/1/'15
click on “Must Reads Archives for the last 60 days.”).
CNBC
debacle Ldot 2015-10-31.jpg – my caption
COLUMN:
A debate that will live in infamy
dailyinterlake.com
[/] By Frank Miele [/] Posted: Saturday, October 31, 2015
5:04 pm [/] http://j.mp/0DebateInfamy
[/] or
http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/column-a-debate-that-will-live-in-infamy/article_c056c8a4-8023-11e5-a7f6-c3e3935cbc39.html
As
I write this, it’s approximately 48 hours since CNBC launched a
sneak attack on the Republican presidential candidates in Boulder,
Colorado, and the political battle lines are still being drawn, but
one things is certain: War has been declared.
Another
thing is almost certain as well: Just as with Pearl Harbor, when the
Japanese drew first blood, they had no idea what kind of massive
response they were about to see leveled back at them.
The
three stooges, er, moderators who set out to do battle with the top
10 candidates in the Wednesday evening debate are either as out of
touch with reality as Jeb Bush, or they went into the debate like
wannabe martyr jihadis who gladly strap on a stick-dynamite bomb for
the sheer pleasure of taking out the enemy.
The
first question was no doubt meant to distract the candidates. First
of all, the candidates had been promised an opening statement, which
didn’t materialize. (John Kasich, to his credit — and this is the
only thing I will give him credit for — pretended he didn’t hear
the question and gave his prepared opening statement anyway.) Second
of all, the question was so inane (“name your biggest
weakness”!)that some of the candidates may have worried they were
being lured into a deadly “battle of wits” with a Sicilian (see
“The Princess Bride” for more details!).
But
it was with the second question that the scales started to fall away
from everyone’s eyes as it became obvious that the questioners were
not wits, but world-class buffoons who considered themselves the
arbiters of intelligence and good taste (once again, check out that
Sicilian in “The Princess Bride”).
John
Harwood, the lead buffoon — whose name will live in infamy as long
as there are debates — tried to humiliate Donald Trump by mocking
several key planks of his very popular platform, and then asking “Is
this a comic book version of a presidential campaign?”
Trump,
who by now is used to pretentious journalists trying to ambush him
(pace Megyn Kelly), politely pointed out to Harwood that it was “not
a very nicely asked question the way you say that.”
After
that, Harwood’s co-inquisitor Becky Quick went after Ben Carson,
the top dog among Republican candidates for the past week or two, and
told him his flat tax plan doesn’t make any sense. Now, she may be
right, but the proper way to run a debate is to give the candidate
enough rope to hang himself, with the able assistance of his
opponents, not to garrote the poor man while he is belly up to a
podium. Quick not only asked the question, she then told Carson he
was either a liar or stupid (OK, not in so many words) for failing to
agree with her that his tax plan was a great big poopie diaper (OK,
not in so many words).
After
Harwood tried unsuccessfully to get Gov. Kasich to repeat some
inflammatory comments he had made the previous day about Trump and
Carson, the conversation moved on to some other candidates.
The
last moderator, Carl Quintanilla, managed to anger the entire
population of the United States by defending the IRS from Carly
Fiorina’s plan to reduce the federal tax code from 73,000 pages
down to three. “Is that using really small type?” Quintanilla
chimed in (twice actually, probably because he couldn’t understand
why he didn’t get a laugh the first time) sounding for all the
world like a snarky seventh-grader who has no idea why he can’t get
a date.
The
next question, also by Quintanilla, tried to body check Marco Rubio
into the wall and make him cry. Calling Rubio “a young man in a
hurry” (for the record, he’s 44), Quintanilla told the U.S.
senator he should “slow down, get a few more things done” before
running for president, and show up for more votes in the do-nothing
Senate.
Naturally,
this made Marco mad, but he didn’t fight back. He got even by
knocking Quintanilla’s curveball out of the park:
“That’s
exactly what the Republican establishment says too. Why don’t you
wait in line? Wait for what? This country is running out of time. We
can’t afford to have another four years like the last eight years.”
Quintanilla
didn’t know he had been flanked, so he continued to press forward
with his failed line of attack. “The Sun-Sentinel [says] you act
like you hate your job. Do you?”
Rubio
suddenly sounded more like President Reagan than the dopey kid wet
behind the ears that Quintanilla painted him to be: “I read that
editorial today with a great amusement. It’s actually evidence of
the bias that exists in the American media today.” Rubio pointed
out the hypocrisy of a newspaper that endorsed John Kerry and Barack
Obama when they missed multiple votes as U.S. senators while running
for president, but is morally offended by his own necessity of doing
the same.
It
was at this point when Jeb Bush decided to commit ritual harakiri by
hitching his wagon to the moderators’ flailing fortunes. For a
second, it appeared that Bush would come to the defense of his former
apprentice Rubio. If he had done so, with passion and righteous
anger, he might have saved his campaign. Instead he pointed the wrong
end of his dull blade at Rubio and impaled himself on a foolish
demand that Rubio should resign from the Senate. If absence from
one’s job were enough to necessitate resignation, then Gov. Bush
would have resigned from the presidential race long ago because he
certainly hasn’t been present and accounted for in this primary
campaign!
Rubio
quickly dispatched Bush by noting the self-evident truth that the
reason his former mentor was criticizing his Senate record was
because “someone has convinced you that attacking me is going to
help you.”
Fittingly,
John Harwood circled around the already savaged Gov. Bush and asked
him to explain why he was such an abject failure, but with a
brilliant stroke of liberal bias, Harwood encouraged Bush to blame
the dopey Republicans who aren’t smart enough to vote for him.
“Ben
Bernanke, who was appointed Fed chairman by your brother, recently
wrote a book in which he said he no longer considers himself a
Republican because the Republican Party has given in to
Know-Nothingism. Is that why you’re having a difficult time in this
race?”
You
have to hand it to Harwood. By working in the Bernanke quote about
Know-Nothingism, he appealed to both the ill-informed majority of
Democrat voters who would assume it simply meant Republicans are
stupid, and also to the better-informed voters who knew it referred
to a 19th century movement opposed to unrestricted immigration
because they feared it would alter the character of our nation.
Harwood
may have even been hoping he could coax Bush into saying something
stupid about illegal immigration such as his classic description of
crossing the border illegally as “an act of love.” Bush didn’t
take the bait, possibly because he was still weakened by being worked
over by Rubio a minute before.
Becky
Quick came back into the fray to taunt Carly Fiorina with a familiar
jab at her record as the CEO of Hewlett Packard, a position from
which she was fired. Fiorina gave her usual, well-rehearsed response
to the attack, and then it was Sen. Ted Cruz’s turn.
Carl
Quintanilla thought he would taunt Cruz, a dedicated opponent of more
government spending while the national debt is $19 trillion and
rising: “Doesn’t your opposition show that you’re not the kind
of problem solver American voters want?”
Well,
Boy Howdy! There’s no getting anything past these moderators. For
sure, the American voters want someone who will send them and their
children deeper into debt. No doubt, they oppose principled
leadership that tells the truth about our inability to maintain our
welfare state into the far-distant future (let’s say about 2030).
And so, of course, Ted Cruz is anathema to the bought-and-paid-for
American voter.
But
just a minute. Ted Cruz is having none of it. Suddenly, he rises up
like a Shakespearean hero and fights back. He’s mad as hell, and
he’s not going to take it any more, and the American public watches
enamored as someone finally speaks blistering truth to the bullies.
“The
questions that have been asked so far in this debate illustrate why
the American people don’t trust the media. This is not a cage
match. And, you look at the questions — ‘Donald Trump, are you a
comic-book villain?’ ‘Ben Carson, can you do math?’ ‘John
Kasich, will you insult two people over here?’ ‘Marco Rubio, why
don’t you resign?’ ‘Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen?’
How about talking about the substantive issues the people care
about?”
All
across America people stood cheering in their living rooms. “You go
Ted. You tell ’em.”
The
sneak attack had been effectively countered, and from that point
forward, most of the candidates joined forces against the slippery
sloppy questions. The entire nation rose up to ask, “Could those
moderators possibly have not known how foolish they were? And what
does that say about the mainstream media?”
Watch
the tape, or read the transcript of the debate online. You owe it to
yourself to see the blatant attempt to manipulate public opinion by
insulting the standard-bearers of the Republican Party. There is no
reasonable, responsible Democrat anywhere who could defend the
behavior of the three intemperate moderators.
You
could almost say there was “blood coming out of [their] eyes; blood
coming out of [their] wherever...” except we now know you can’t
say that. Oh wait, it was the now totally discredited mainstream
media that told us you can’t say it, so maybe Trump was right when
he said it after all.
Frank
Miele is managing editor of the Daily Inter Lake. If you don’t like
his opinion, stop by the office and he will gladly refund your two
cents. E-mail responses may be sent to edit@dailyinterlake.com
Thank
you for reading 5 free articles on our site. You can come back at the
end of your 30-day period for another 5 free articles, or you can
purchase a subscription and continue to enjoy valuable local news and
information. If you need help, please contact our office at
406-755-7000 . You need an online service to view this article in its
entirety.
I2C
151101aa Luk7v32 CNBC Debate Debacle | I2C | 151101 1517 et